Twitty v. Chelton Estates, Ltd.

192 Misc. 951, 82 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3245
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 19, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pécora, J.

Plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant, as landlord, from taking any further steps to evict plaintiffs as tenants of certain premises, pending the determination of this action for a declaratory judgment. In the declaratory judgment action plaintiffs seek an adjudication that the construction and maintenance by plaintiffs of a platform, pipe and rest room in the demised premises, without the consent of the landlord, are not violations of any substantial provision of the lease between the parties. However, the summary proceeding heretofore commenced by the landlord, is predicated upon the claim that the plaintiffs’ action in making the [952]*952alterations described without the landlord’s consent, constitutes violation of substantial terms of the lease. Plaintiffs thus have an adequate remedy at law by interposing as an answer on the summary proceedings their contention that they had a right to make the alterations. The acts complained of have already occurred. The only effect of a declaratory judgment in this case would be to determine whether plaintiffs had a valid defense to the summary proceedings. Since plaintiffs have an adequate remedy in the summary proceedings the motion for an injunction is denied and the cross motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Twitty v. Chelton Estates, Ltd., 192 Misc. 951, 82 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3245 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1948).

192 Misc. 951 (Twitty v. Chelton Estates, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

150 East 57th St. Associates v. Fletcher
35 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)