Twitty v. Chelton Estates, Ltd.
This text of 192 Misc. 951 (Twitty v. Chelton Estates, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant, as landlord, from taking any further steps to evict plaintiffs as tenants of certain premises, pending the determination of this action for a declaratory judgment. In the declaratory judgment action plaintiffs seek an adjudication that the construction and maintenance by plaintiffs of a platform, pipe and rest room in the demised premises, without the consent of the landlord, are not violations of any substantial provision of the lease between the parties. However, the summary proceeding heretofore commenced by the landlord, is predicated upon the claim that the plaintiffs’ action in making the [952]*952alterations described without the landlord’s consent, constitutes violation of substantial terms of the lease. Plaintiffs thus have an adequate remedy at law by interposing as an answer on the summary proceedings their contention that they had a right to make the alterations. The acts complained of have already occurred. The only effect of a declaratory judgment in this case would be to determine whether plaintiffs had a valid defense to the summary proceedings. Since plaintiffs have an adequate remedy in the summary proceedings the motion for an injunction is denied and the cross motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. Settle order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 Misc. 951, 82 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twitty-v-chelton-estates-ltd-nysupct-1948.