Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk
This text of Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk (Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KATHALEEN ST. JUDE MCCORMICK LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734
July 9, 2024
Catherine A. Gaul Aaron Greenspan Randall J. Teti PlainSite Ashby & Geddes, P.A. 956 Carolina Street 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94107 Wilmington, DE 19899
Re: Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk, et al., C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM
Dear Counsel:
On June 18, 2024, Aaron Greenspan filed a challenge under Court of Chancery
Rule 5.1 to the continued confidential treatment of docketed items in the above-
referenced action. That case is closed, but that status does not preclude Mr.
Greenspan’s challenge. Rule 5.1, which was amended on June 14, 2024, allows any
person to “challenge the confidential treatment of a Confidential Filing.”1 The
challenger must first file a notice with the Register in Chancery identifying each
challenged confidential filing by docket number, Transaction ID, title, or other
identifying information.2 Mr. Greenspan’s challenge satisfied these requirements by
specifically identifying twelve docket numbers and attachments.
1 Ct. Ch. R. 5.1(g)(1).
2 Ct. Ch. R. 5.1(g)(2). C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM July 9, 2024 Page 2 of 2
Once challenged, any person seeking continued confidential treatment must
move within five days of the challenge notice.3 That deadline elapsed on June 26,
2024. Before the deadline passed, Twitter, Inc.’s successor in interest, X Corp., moved
for an extension of time to July 17, 2024, to review the challenged filings to determine
whether any information in the filings should remain confidential.
This court has the discretion to extend the time limits imposed by the Court of
Chancery Rules, and it is appropriate to allow X Corp. more time to review the
challenged filings and prepare public version of those filings. X Corp.’s motion is
granted. X Corp. has until 4:30 p.m. on July 17, 2024, to respond to Mr. Greenspan’s
challenge. No further extensions will be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Sincerely,
/s/ Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick
Chancellor
cc: All counsel of record (by File & ServeXpress)
3 Ct. Ch. R. 5.1(g)(6)(A).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twitter-inc-v-elon-r-musk-delch-2024.