Twitchell v. Rutland Railroad
228 A.D. 860
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 228 A.D. 860 (Twitchell v. Rutland Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Twitchell v. Rutland Railroad, 228 A.D. 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinions
[861]*861Judgments and orders affirmed, with costs in one action. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Hasbrouek, J., dissents, and votes for reversal and a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Goodman
275 U.S. 66 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Miller v. New York Central Railroad Company
170 N.E. 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Miller v. New York Central Railroad
226 A.D. 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twitchell-v-rutland-railroad-nyappdiv-1930.