Twitchell Construction Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Twitchell Construction Co. v. Johnson

102 A. 758, 78 N.H. 517, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 58

DecidedDecember 4, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A. 758 (Twitchell Construction Co. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Twitchell Construction Co. v. Johnson, 102 A. 758, 78 N.H. 517, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 58 (N.H. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Young, J.

It would have been permissible for the plaintiffs to show the charge the telephone company made for connecting them with the defendant’s place of business by the books of the company, Lassone v. Railroad, 66 N. H. 345; Roberts v. Rice, 69 N. H. 472; and since the books were in Vermont the court could permit the plaintiffs to show the charge in the way they did. Roberts v. Company, ante, 491. This.disposes of both of the defendant’s exceptions.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young, J.

It would have been permissible for the plaintiffs to show the charge the telephone company made for connecting them with the defendant’s place of business by the books of the company, Lassone v. Railroad, 66 N. H. 345; Roberts v. Rice, 69 N. H. 472; and since the books were in Vermont the court could permit the plaintiffs to show the charge in the way they did. Roberts v. Company, ante, 491. This.disposes of both of the defendant’s exceptions.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A. 758, 78 N.H. 517, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twitchell-construction-co-v-johnson-nh-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack