Twitchell Construction Co. v. Johnson

102 A. 758, 78 N.H. 517, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 58
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 4, 1917·Published

Opinion

Young, J.

It would have been permissible for the plaintiffs to show the charge the telephone company made for connecting them with the defendant’s place of business by the books of the company, Lassone v. Railroad, 66 N. H. 345; Roberts v. Rice, 69 N. H. 472; and since the books were in Vermont the court could permit the plaintiffs to show the charge in the way they did. Roberts v. Company, ante, 491. This.disposes of both of the defendant’s exceptions.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Twitchell Construction Co. v. Johnson, 102 A. 758, 78 N.H. 517, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 58 (N.H. 1917).

102 A. 758 (Twitchell Construction Co. v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lassone v. Boston & Lowell Railroad
24 A. 902 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1890)
Roberts v. Rice
45 A. 237 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1898)