Twine v. Blau
This text of 172 A.D.2d 605 (Twine v. Blau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), dated October 20, 1989, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs original complaint does not state a cause of action. The amended complaint similarly fails to state a cause of action. We have considered the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D.2d 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twine-v-blau-nyappdiv-1991.