Twin Theatre Co. v. Liquid Carbonic Co.

67 S.E. 1033, 134 Ga. 460, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 227
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 27, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 1033 (Twin Theatre Co. v. Liquid Carbonic Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Twin Theatre Co. v. Liquid Carbonic Co., 67 S.E. 1033, 134 Ga. 460, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 227 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Evans, P. J,

A landlord levied a distress warrant on a soda fountain, which was claimed by one who had sold it to the tenant under a written contract retaining title thereto until the purchase-money was paid. The reserved-title note was not recorded within thirty days of its date, but was recorded before the levy of the distress warrant. The evidence showed a complete rescission of the contract of sale, and a surrender of the soda fountain by the tenant to the claimant prior to the levy. Held, that it was not error to direct a verdict for the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castaneda v. National Cash Register Co.
29 P.2d 730 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1934)
In re Baker
162 A. 356 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1932)
Commercial Credit Co. v. Gaiser
7 P.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 1033, 134 Ga. 460, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twin-theatre-co-v-liquid-carbonic-co-ga-1910.