Twin Falls County v. Hoover

Idaho Supreme Court

Twin Falls County v. Hoover

286 P. 919, 49 Idaho 150, 1930 Ida. LEXIS 92

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided March 29, 1930·No. Nos. 5555, 5556.·Published

Opinion

The only material question deemed necessary to a decision in the companion cases of Twin Falls County ex rel. Ware v.Hoover (No. 5555) and Minidoka County ex rel.Hellenbeck v. Hoover (No. 5556), argued and submitted at the same time as Minidoka County ex rel. Hellenbeck v.Hoover (No. 5554), ante, p. 146, is that disposed of by the opinion in the cause last mentioned. The same order, therefore, will be entered in Nos. 5555 and 5556.

Givens, C.J., and Lee, Varian and McNaughton, JJ., concur. *Page 151

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The only material question deemed necessary to a decision in the companion cases of Twin Falls County ex rel. Ware v.Hoover (No. 5555) and Minidoka County ex rel.Hellenbeck v. Hoover (No. 5556), argued and submitted at the same time as Minidoka County ex rel. Hellenbeck v.Hoover (No. 5554), ante, p. 146, is that disposed of by the opinion in the cause last mentioned. The same order, therefore, will be entered in Nos. 5555 and 5556.

Givens, C.J., and Lee, Varian and McNaughton, JJ., concur. *Page 151

Twin Falls County v. Hoover, 286 P. 919, 49 Idaho 150, 1930 Ida. LEXIS 92 (Idaho 1930).

Pincite

286 P. 919 (Twin Falls County v. Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.