Twin Falls County v. Henderson
This text of 305 U.S. 568 (Twin Falls County v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal herein is dis[569]*569missed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question, Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Williams v. Mayor, 289 U. S. 36, 40; Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District, ante, p. 564; (2) for the reason that the judgment sought herein to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 366; Hale v. Lewis, 181 U. S. 473, 479; Gauss v. Detroit Trust Co., 297 U. S. 695.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 U.S. 568, 59 S. Ct. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twin-falls-county-v-henderson-scotus-1938.