Twin Falls County v. Henderson

305 U.S. 568, 59 S. Ct. 149
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 7, 1938
DocketNo. 409
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 305 U.S. 568 (Twin Falls County v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Twin Falls County v. Henderson, 305 U.S. 568, 59 S. Ct. 149 (1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dis[569]*569missed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question, Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Williams v. Mayor, 289 U. S. 36, 40; Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District, ante, p. 564; (2) for the reason that the judgment sought herein to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 366; Hale v. Lewis, 181 U. S. 473, 479; Gauss v. Detroit Trust Co., 297 U. S. 695.

Mr. James R. Bothwell for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Fire Fighters Local 279 v. Kingham
420 P.2d 254 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 U.S. 568, 59 S. Ct. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twin-falls-county-v-henderson-scotus-1938.