Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho
235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205, 59 L. Ed. 427, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 927
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho, 235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205, 59 L. Ed. 427, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 927 (1914).
235 U.S. 690 (Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
231 U.S. 245 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)