Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho
235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205, 59 L. Ed. 427, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 927
This text of 235 U.S. 690 (Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho, 235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205, 59 L. Ed. 427, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 927 (1914).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
231 U.S. 245 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205, 59 L. Ed. 427, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twin-falls-canal-co-v-idaho-scotus-1914.