Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter
This text of 295 P. 431 (Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal is from an order denying a motion for change of venue. In addition to the merits various procedural motions have been interposed by both parties, including a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, asking that no costs be allowed in the event of the dismissal.
It appears that the appellants are or were public officials sued only in their official capacity. There is no cross-appeal and respondent does not object to the motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore the appeal is dismissed. (4 C. J. 563.) No costs awarded. (Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 47 Ida. 346, 275 Pac. 780, at 781; 36 Cyc. 923.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 P. 431, 50 Idaho 268, 1931 Ida. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twin-falls-canal-co-v-carter-idaho-1931.