Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter

Idaho Supreme Court

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter

295 P. 431, 50 Idaho 268, 1931 Ida. LEXIS 7

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided January 21, 1931·No. No. 5498.·Published

Opinion

GIVENS, J.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion for change of venue. In addition to the merits various procedural motions have been interposed by both parties, including a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, asking that no costs be allowed in the event of the dismissal.

It appears that the appellants are or were public officials sued only in their official capacity. There is no cross-appeal and respondent does not object to the motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore the appeal is dismissed. (4 C. J. 563.) No costs awarded. (Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 47 Ida. 346, 275 Pac. 780, at 781; 36 Cyc. 923.)

. Lee, C. J., Varían and MeNaughton, JJ., and Koelsch, D. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIVENS, J.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion for change of venue. In addition to the merits various procedural motions have been interposed by both parties, including a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, asking that no costs be allowed in the event of the dismissal.

It appears that the appellants are or were public officials sued only in their official capacity. There is no cross-appeal and respondent does not object to the motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore the appeal is dismissed. (4 C. J. 563.) No costs awarded. (Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 47 Ida. 346, 275 Pac. 780, at 781; 36 Cyc. 923.)

. Lee, C. J., Varían and MeNaughton, JJ., and Koelsch, D. J., concur.

Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter, 295 P. 431, 50 Idaho 268, 1931 Ida. LEXIS 7 (Idaho 1931).

Pincite

295 P. 431 (Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related