Twin Cities Area New Party v. McKenna

117 F.3d 1423, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24110, 1997 WL 401178
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Twin Cities Area New Party v. McKenna. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 F.3d 196
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 8, 1997·No. 94-3417·Unpublished

Opinion

117 F.3d 1423

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
TWIN CITIES AREA NEW PARTY, Appellant
v.
Lou McKENNA, Director, Ramsey County Department of Property
Records and Revenue; Joan ANDERSON-GROWE,
Secretary of State, State of Minnesota, Appellees.

No. 94-3417.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

July 8, 1997.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, FAGG and WOOD,* Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case has been reversed by the Supreme Court, Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party, 117 S.Ct. 1364, 1375 (1997), and remanded to us for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. That opinion disposes of all of the issues in the case. Accordingly, we now affirm the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

It is so ordered.

*

The Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Twin Cities Area New Party v. McKenna, 117 F.3d 1423, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24110, 1997 WL 401178 (8th Cir. 1997).

117 F.3d 1423 (Twin Cities Area New Party v. McKenna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party
520 U.S. 351 (Supreme Court, 1997)