Twiehaus v. Watkins
Opinion
Appellant Twiehaus (Superintendent) appeals from the circuit court’s upholding of a decision of the Personnel Advisory Board rejecting Superintendent’s dismissal of respondent Watkins (employee).
Employee worked in a direct care position at a center for the mentally retarded. She was fired for her failure to report information she had heard concerning physical abuse of a resident. The Personnel Advisory Board of the State of Missouri found another employee “purporting to know about an incident of client abuse told the appellant [employee] about her suspicions while they were in private conversation.”
While there is a duty that employees must report known or suspected abuse, the Board found as a matter of fact that employee’s information of the incident was merely a rumor. Since the Board went on to say the duty to report was not violated, it is clear they found as a fact that the information did not rise to the level of knowledge or suspicion.
The order of the administrative agency is supported by competent and substantial ev[299]*299idence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
730 S.W.2d 298 (Twiehaus v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.