Twenty X, LLC v. Bombardier, Inc.

S.D. New York

Twenty X, LLC v. Bombardier, Inc.

DecidedJune 18, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-01512

StatusUnknown

This text of Twenty X, LLC v. Bombardier, Inc. (Twenty X, LLC v. Bombardier, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Twenty X, LLC v. Bombardier, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ TWENTY X, LLC, : ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff, : COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF ~against- : SUBJECT-MATTER : JURISDICTION BOMBARDIER, INC., Defendant. 25 Civ. 1512 (AKH) pen eee eee nnmenneneneneceeee X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff Twenty X, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“LLC”), sues Bombardier, Inc., a Canadian corporation. See Compl. at 2-3. The alleged jurisdictional basis is diversity of citizenship, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Compl. at 7 5. LLCs are deemed to be citizens of all the states in which their constituents are citizens. See Handelsman v. Bedford Vill, Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51 (2d Cir. 2000); see also Americold Realty Trust v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 1012, 1014 (2016) (‘While humans and corporations can assert their own citizenship, other entities take the citizenship of their members.”). Here, the Complaint has failed to identify each of the members of the underlying LLC and allege their respective citizenships. . The Complaint is dismissed, with leave to replead for the sole purpose of alleging an adequate basis of diverse citizenship, no later than seven (7) days from the entry of this Order. The Clerk shall terminate ECF No, 16.

SO ORDERED. wh Dated: June (B20 New fYork, New York ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ TWENTY X, LLC, : ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff, : COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF ~against- : SUBJECT-MATTER : JURISDICTION BOMBARDIER, INC., Defendant. 25 Civ. 1512 (AKH) pen eee eee nnmenneneneneceeee X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff Twenty X, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“LLC”), sues Bombardier, Inc., a Canadian corporation. See Compl. at 2-3. The alleged jurisdictional basis is diversity of citizenship, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Compl. at 7 5. LLCs are deemed to be citizens of all the states in which their constituents are citizens. See Handelsman v. Bedford Vill, Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51 (2d Cir. 2000); see also Americold Realty Trust v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 1012, 1014 (2016) (‘While humans and corporations can assert their own citizenship, other entities take the citizenship of their members.”). Here, the Complaint has failed to identify each of the members of the underlying LLC and allege their respective citizenships. . The Complaint is dismissed, with leave to replead for the sole purpose of alleging an adequate basis of diverse citizenship, no later than seven (7) days from the entry of this Order. The Clerk shall terminate ECF No, 16.

SO ORDERED. wh Dated: June (B20 New fYork, New York ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Twenty X, LLC v. Bombardier, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twenty-x-llc-v-bombardier-inc-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack