Twenty Tenants HDFC v. Bargallo

2025 NY Slip Op 30356(U)

• Court: New York Supreme Court, New York County
• Decided: January 29, 2025
• Docket: Index No. 155647/2024
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Twenty Tenants HDFC v Bargallo 2025 NY Slip Op 30356(U) January 29, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155647/2024 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2025 04:24 P~ INDEX NO. 155647/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY

PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice ---------------------------X INDEX NO. 155647/2024 TWENTY TENANTS HDFC, MOTION DATE 08/06/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 - V -

CHRISTIAN BARGALLO, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendant. ---------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42,43,44,45,48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 were read on this motion to/for INJUNCTION/RESTRAINING ORDER

Upon the foregoing documents, and after oral argument, which took place on November

12, 2024, where Gregory Bougopolous, Esq. appeared for Plaintiff Twenty Tenants HDFC

("Plaintiff') and Michael Pereira, Esq. appeared for Defendant Christian Bargallo a/k/a Gio

Bargallo ("Defendant"), Plaintiffs order to show cause seeking a preliminary injunction and

directing Defendant to pay use and occupancy is denied. Defendant's cross motion to dismiss

Plaintiffs Complaint or in the alternative to transfer this action to Housing Court pursuant to CPLR

325(d) is granted in part and is otherwise moot.

I. Background

Defendant lives in Apartment 3FE at 450 West 55th Street, New York, New York (the

"Premises") (NYSCEF Docs. 27, 31). Plaintiff is Defendant's landlord and initiated a

Landlord/Tenant action against Defendant captioned Twenty Tenants HDFC v Christian Barga/lo,

Index No. LT-305111-24/NY (the "Housing Court Action"), which is pending, seeking rental

arrears and eviction. The Housing Court Action commenced on March 18, 2024, and on or about

155647/2024 TWENTY TENANTS HDFC vs. BARGALLO, CHRISTIAN ET AL Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 001

[* 1] 1 of 4 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2025 04:24 PM] INDEX NO. 155647/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2025

June 10, 2024, Plaintiff obtained a default judgment against Defendant which included a warrant

of eviction. On June 12, 2024, Defendant moved to vacate the default judgment. According to

NYSCEF, a decision on that order to show cause remains sub Judice as of the date of this Decision

and Order.

On June 20, 2024, Plaintiff commenced this action seeking ejectment, use and occupancy,

declaratory judgment, unpaid rent, attorneys' fees, and an injunction. Plaintiff moved, by order to

show cause, for injunctive relief and Defendant responded with a motion to dismiss on various

grounds, including CPLR 321 l(a)(4). Defendant also asked this Court to transfer this matter to

Housing Court pursuant to CPLR 325(d) if the matter is not dismissed. When Defendant filed his

motion to dismiss, Plaintiff amended his Complaint to seek only declaratory judgment, attorneys'

fees, and an injunction.

II. Discussion

Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted. CPLR 321 l(a)(4) provides the Court with wide

discretion to dismiss an action "on the ground that another action is pending between the same

parties" and arises "out of the same subject matter or series of alleged wrongs" (Shah v RBC

Capital Markets LLC, 115 AD3d 444 [1st Dept 2014]). "It is inconsequential that different legal

theories or claims are set forth in the two actions" (id. citing Whitney v Whitney, 57 NY2d 731

[1982] see also Syncora Guar. Inc. v JP. Morgan Sec. LLC, 110 AD3d 87, 96 [1st Dept 2013]).

Dismissal is also proper under CPLR 321 l(a)(4) to avoid conflicting rulings (Eurotech Const.

Corp. v Illinois National Insurance Co., 187 AD3d 664 [1st Dept 2020]). Here, there is a prior

pending action in Housing Court between the identical parties (see Twenty Tenants HDFC v

Christian Barga/lo, Index No. LT-305111-24/NY).

155647/2024 TWENTY TENANTS HDFC vs. BARGALLO, CHRISTIAN ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 001

2 of 4 [* 2] [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2025 04:24 P~ INDEX NO. 155647/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2025

Although the legal theories asserted in this action are technically distinct from the action

in Housing Court, they are closely intertwined and related, and Plaintiff would still be afforded the

same ultimate relief it seeks in Housing Court (see generally Nurlybayev v SmileDirectClub, Inc.,

205 AD3d 455 [1st Dept 2022]; Prospect Funding Holdings LLC v Maslowski, 146 AD3d 535 [1st

Dept 2017]; Stewart Title Ins. Co. v Wingate, Kearney & Cullen, 145 AD3d 462 [1st Dept 2016]).

Based on Plaintiffs Amended Complaint here, it seeks a declaratory judgment that

Defendant violated his lease, attorneys' fees, and a permanent injunction prohibiting Defendant

from engaging in harassing, threatening, and nuisance behavior. In Housing Court, Plaintiff seeks

the removal of Plaintiff from the Premises, unpaid rent, and attorneys' fees. If the prior action

pending in Housing Court finds Defendant breached his lease and evicts Defendant, 1 the Plaintiff

is essentially afforded the declaratory and injunctive relief it seeks here (see also Tremada 201

East 17th Street LLC v Korn, 2021 WL 2665659 at *1 [Sup. Ct. NY Co. 2021] [Nervo, J.] citing

3054 Godwin Terrace Realty Co. v Armstrong, 190 AD2d 617 [1st Dept 1993] [although couched

in terms of declaratory judgment, action essentially sought eviction, making removal to Housing

Court appropriate]).

Moreover, Defendant argues Housing Court is the better equipped forum to deal with the

issues raised in this action as there are available resources such as the universal access to counsel,

a guardian ad !item program, and adult protective services programs which are not readily

available in Supreme Court. Therefore, Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted and to the extent

the parties are not able to reach an amicable resolution, they shall continue proceedings in the

pending Housing Court matter. Because the matter is dismissed, Plaintiffs order to show cause

seeking an injunction and use and occupancy is denied. Further, because the Complaint has been

1 Plaintiff has already obtained a judgment of possession in Housing Court and there remains pending a motion to vacate that judgment. 155647/2024 TWENTY TENANTS HDFC vs. BARGALLO, CHRISTIAN ET AL Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 001

3 of 4 [* 3] [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2025 04:24 PM] INDEX NO. 155647/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2025

dismissed, the branch of Defendant's motion seeking to transfer this action to Housing Court

pursuant to CPLR 325(d) is moot.

Accordingly, it is hereby,

ORDERED that Plaintiffs order to show cause seeking a preliminary injunction and use

and occupancy is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant's motion is granted in part and is otherwise moot; and it is

further

ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to CPLR

321 l(a)(4) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that as the Complaint is dismissed, the branch of Defendant's motion which

seeks removal of this action to Housing Court pursuant to CPLR 325(d) is moot; and it is further

ORDERED that within ten days of entry, counsel for Defendant shall serve a copy of this

Decision and Order, with notice of entry, on all parties via NYSCEF.

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.

1/29/2025 DATE

CHECK ONE: x CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

GRANTED □ DENIED x GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE

155647/2024 TWENTY TENANTS HDFC vs. BARGALLO, CHRISTIAN ET AL Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 001

4 of 4 [* 4]