Twenty-fourth Ward Loan Co. v. Joseph

8 Ohio C.C. 227
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJanuary 15, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ohio C.C. 227 (Twenty-fourth Ward Loan Co. v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Twenty-fourth Ward Loan Co. v. Joseph, 8 Ohio C.C. 227 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

Smith, J.

This action was commenced in the Superior Court March 17, 1893, and therefore comes within the provisions of the act of March 28, 1892 (vol. 89 Ohio Laws, 148). Under section 5227, as thereby amended, “a perspn desiring to appeal bis cause to the circuit court, shall, within three days after the judgment or order is entered, enter on the records [228]*228notice of such intention, and within thirty days after the entering of such judgment or order upon the journal of the court, give an undertaking,” etc. The judgment attempted to be appealed from was entered November 23, 1893. On November 25th a motion for a new trial was filed, and November 28th the appellants gave notice of their intention to appeal the cause to the circuit court, and on December 20th appeal bond was filed.

Scott Bonham, for appellant. Jos. S. Meyers, contra.

The notice of an appeal not having been given until five days after the judgment was entered, was not in time, and the appeal must be dismissed, notwithstanding the fact that the motion for a new trial does not seem to have been disposed of.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ohio C.C. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twenty-fourth-ward-loan-co-v-joseph-ohiocirct-1894.