Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc.
This text of 282 N.E.2d 118 (Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The plaintiff has failed to state any evidentiary facts, warranting a trial, to support its allegation that the defendant was motivated by malice in publishing its critique of the plaintiff’s restaurant. (See, e.g., Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U. S. 29; New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254; Frink v. McEldowney, 29 N Y 2d 720; Kent v. City of Buffalo, 29 N Y 2d 818.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 N.E.2d 118, 30 N.Y.2d 595, 331 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twenty-five-east-40th-street-restaurant-corp-v-forbes-inc-ny-1972.