Twelve-Twelve Corp. v. Walden

233 So. 2d 194, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6654
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1970
DocketNos. 69-304, 69-305
StatusPublished

This text of 233 So. 2d 194 (Twelve-Twelve Corp. v. Walden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Twelve-Twelve Corp. v. Walden, 233 So. 2d 194, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6654 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

McNULTY, Judge.

Appellant brought suit to contest the validity of the assessment of its properties [195]*195in Hillsborough County. It directly appeals from an adverse judgment.

Appellant’s main complaint is the method of assessment, i. e., the “block method”, used by appellee Tax Assessor in assessing the subject property. However, the record is replete with evidence from which the court could, and manifestly did, find that the “block method” is an acceptable and recognized technique of evaluating properties for taxation purposes;1 and appellant has not demonstrated that the trial court erred in rejecting appellant’s contention that its suggested method of evaluation was not employed instead of the method used in fact.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., concurs. PIERCE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osborn v. Yeager
155 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
R. H. James, Inc. v. Anderson
165 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 So. 2d 194, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twelve-twelve-corp-v-walden-fladistctapp-1970.