Twelve-Twelve Corp. v. Walden

233 So. 2d 194, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6654
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1970·No. Nos. 69-304, 69-305·Published

Opinion

McNULTY, Judge.

Appellant brought suit to contest the validity of the assessment of its properties [195] in Hillsborough County. It directly appeals from an adverse judgment.

Appellant’s main complaint is the method of assessment, i. e., the “block method”, used by appellee Tax Assessor in assessing the subject property. However, the record is replete with evidence from which the court could, and manifestly did, find that the “block method” is an acceptable and recognized technique of evaluating properties for taxation purposes;1 and appellant has not demonstrated that the trial court erred in rejecting appellant’s contention that its suggested method of evaluation was not employed instead of the method used in fact.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., concurs. PIERCE, J., dissents.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Twelve-Twelve Corp. v. Walden, 233 So. 2d 194, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6654 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

233 So. 2d 194 (Twelve-Twelve Corp. v. Walden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osborn v. Yeager
155 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
R. H. James, Inc. v. Anderson
165 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)