Twelfth Ward Bank v. Rogers

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Twelfth Ward Bank v. Rogers

35 Misc. 789, 72 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 789 (Twelfth Ward Bank v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Twelfth Ward Bank v. Rogers, 35 Misc. 789, 72 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It seems from the testimony that the defendant received full consideration for his original indorsement. Upon, renewal of the note, he sought to show an agreement with plaintiff’s president that he should be held harmless upon his renewal indorsement. This fact is doubtful, but even if existent, it could [790]*790not affect the plaintiff’s rights, as its president had no power to release its debtor from liability, without consideration.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.,

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It seems from the testimony that the defendant received full consideration for his original indorsement. Upon, renewal of the note, he sought to show an agreement with plaintiff’s president that he should be held harmless upon his renewal indorsement. This fact is doubtful, but even if existent, it could [790]*790not affect the plaintiff’s rights, as its president had no power to release its debtor from liability, without consideration.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.,

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 789, 72 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/twelfth-ward-bank-v-rogers-nyappterm-1901.