Tweed v. Tweed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tweed v. Tweed

147 A.D.2d 556, 538 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1597

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1989·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.), entered June 11, 1987, as (1) granted, without a hearing, the plaintiff’s motion for temporary custody of the infant issue of the marriage, and (2) granted the plaintiff an interim counsel fee in the sum of $6,000.

[557]*557Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon the instant record, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in awarding temporary custody of the infant children of the parties to the plaintiff and in awarding the plaintiff interim counsel fees in the sum of $6,000 (Meltzer v Meltzer, 38 AD2d 522; cf., Biagi v Biagi, 124 AD2d 770, 771; Domestic Relations Law § 237; 22 NYCRR 202.16 [g]; Pacheco v Pacheco, 107 AD2d 741; Flach v Flach, 114 AD2d 929). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.), entered June 11, 1987, as (1) granted, without a hearing, the plaintiff’s motion for temporary custody of the infant issue of the marriage, and (2) granted the plaintiff an interim counsel fee in the sum of $6,000.

[557]*557Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon the instant record, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in awarding temporary custody of the infant children of the parties to the plaintiff and in awarding the plaintiff interim counsel fees in the sum of $6,000 (Meltzer v Meltzer, 38 AD2d 522; cf., Biagi v Biagi, 124 AD2d 770, 771; Domestic Relations Law § 237; 22 NYCRR 202.16 [g]; Pacheco v Pacheco, 107 AD2d 741; Flach v Flach, 114 AD2d 929). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Tweed v. Tweed, 147 A.D.2d 556, 538 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

147 A.D.2d 556 (Tweed v. Tweed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related