Tweed v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tweed v. McDonough

956 So. 2d 1267, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2007 WL 1554146

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2007·No. No. 1D06-4535·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order which denied his - mandamus as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. He argues, among other things, that the circuit court erroneously computed the time for filing of a mandamus petition and that therefore dismissal of the mandamus petition was incorrect. The ap-pellee has notified this court that it agrees and concedes error. We find this concession to be well-taken and accordingly the order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order which denied his - mandamus as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. He argues, among other things, that the circuit court erroneously computed the time for filing of a mandamus petition and that therefore dismissal of the mandamus petition was incorrect. The ap-pellee has notified this court that it agrees and concedes error. We find this concession to be well-taken and accordingly the order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Tweed v. McDonough, 956 So. 2d 1267, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2007 WL 1554146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

956 So. 2d 1267 (Tweed v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.