Tweed v. Coleman

838 So. 2d 1204, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235, 2003 WL 253042
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-4200
StatusPublished

This text of 838 So. 2d 1204 (Tweed v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tweed v. Coleman, 838 So. 2d 1204, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235, 2003 WL 253042 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated November 15, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order Dismissing Case in Part and Order to Show Cause, dated September 23, 2002, is neither a final appealable order nor an appealable partial final order where an interrelated claim for mandamus is pending below. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99-100 (Fla.1974); Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k), (m). The appellant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Appeal, filed January 6, 2003, is denied.

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SLT Warehouse Company v. Webb
304 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 So. 2d 1204, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235, 2003 WL 253042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tweed-v-coleman-fladistctapp-2003.