TW v. State

395 So. 2d 598
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 1981
Docket80-168
StatusPublished

This text of 395 So. 2d 598 (TW v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TW v. State, 395 So. 2d 598 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

395 So.2d 598 (1981)

T.W., a Juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 80-168.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 24, 1981.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Lawrence J. Stein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile, was charged in a delinquency petition with breach of the peace, battery of a law enforcement officer, and resisting arrest. Upon hearing appellant was adjudged delinquent, placed in a community control program under supervision of the Youth Services Program, ordered to pay restitution in a manner and amount to be determined by the counselor, attend counseling, and abide by a curfew.

In this appeal it is contended that the trial judge committed reversible error in ordering that the amount and manner of restitution be determined by the counselor. We find merit in appellant's contention.

In E.Y. v. State, 390 So.2d 776 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), we held that it was reversible error for the trial court to delegate judicial authority to the juvenile's counselor to determine the amount of restitution. For the reason stated, that portion of the order directing restitution in a manner and *599 amount to be determined by the counselor is reversed. In all other respects the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions to the court to afford appellant an evidentiary hearing as to the manner and amount of restitution to be paid to the victim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E. Y. v. State
390 So. 2d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 So. 2d 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tw-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.