TV Azteca, S.A.B. De C v. Publimax, S.A. De C v. Azteca International Corporation, Stations Group, LLC, Northstar McAllen License, LLC, and Patricia Chapoy v. Gloria De Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A.G.J.T., and Armando Ismael Gomez Martinez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 9, 2020
Docket13-18-00287-CV
StatusPublished

This text of TV Azteca, S.A.B. De C v. Publimax, S.A. De C v. Azteca International Corporation, Stations Group, LLC, Northstar McAllen License, LLC, and Patricia Chapoy v. Gloria De Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A.G.J.T., and Armando Ismael Gomez Martinez (TV Azteca, S.A.B. De C v. Publimax, S.A. De C v. Azteca International Corporation, Stations Group, LLC, Northstar McAllen License, LLC, and Patricia Chapoy v. Gloria De Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A.G.J.T., and Armando Ismael Gomez Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TV Azteca, S.A.B. De C v. Publimax, S.A. De C v. Azteca International Corporation, Stations Group, LLC, Northstar McAllen License, LLC, and Patricia Chapoy v. Gloria De Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A.G.J.T., and Armando Ismael Gomez Martinez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00287-CV

TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V., Publimax, S.A. de C.V., Azteca International Corporation, Stations Group, LLC, Northstar McAllen License, LLC, and Patricia Chapoy v. Gloria de los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on behalf of her minor child, A.G.J.T., and Armando Ismael Gomez Martinez

On Appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-1027-09-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the

case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the

appeal are adjudged 50% against appellants, TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V., Publimax,

S.A. de C.V., Azteca International Corporation, Stations Group, LLC, Northstar McAllen

License, LLC, and Patricia Chapoy and 50% against appellees Gloria de los Angeles

Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on behalf of her minor child, A.G.J.T., and Armando

Ismael Gomez Martinez.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 9, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TV Azteca, S.A.B. De C v. Publimax, S.A. De C v. Azteca International Corporation, Stations Group, LLC, Northstar McAllen License, LLC, and Patricia Chapoy v. Gloria De Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A.G.J.T., and Armando Ismael Gomez Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tv-azteca-sab-de-c-v-publimax-sa-de-c-v-azteca-international-texapp-2020.