Tuyes v. Avegno

23 La. Ann. 177
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1871
DocketNo. 2206
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 La. Ann. 177 (Tuyes v. Avegno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuyes v. Avegno, 23 La. Ann. 177 (La. 1871).

Opinion

Ludeling, C. J.

On the eighth of April, 1867, Avegno & Willoz, brokers, purchased, on joint account with the plaintiff, three hundred -shares of the Commercial Waterworks Company, at $68 75 per share,,, amounting in the aggregate to $20,625. For the payment of these shares, Avegno & Willoz advanced $625 and the plaintiff, in accordance with the agreement of the parties, executed three promissory notes, one in favor of the Bank of America for $6000, one in iavor of the Merchants’ Mutual Insurance Company for $7000 and one in favor of .the New Orleans Mutual Insurance Company for $7000, all. bearing eight per cent, per annum interest; and as collateral security for the payment of the notes, the three hundred shares of the Commercial Waterworks Company were given to the bank and insurance companies respectively.

[178]*178Ceveral months after the maturity of the notes and after the notes, nad been renewed several times by the plaintiff, tbe pledgees notified the pledgor tüat, the stocks pledged having depreciated in the market, they would require a margin, that is, the payment of a part of the notes, and failing to do this the three hundred shares of the Commercial Waterworks Company were sold according to law to satisfy the notes held by the pledgees. Tbe loss incurred by tbe parties in this venture was $9029 80, one-half of which must be borne by the defendants. The whole amount was paid by the plaintiff and he claimed from his partners their proportion, less the sum advanced by them. This he is clearly entitled to recover. C. C. 2865 [2836]; Pothier, Contrat de Sociétó, c. 1, sec. 4.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the court a qua be affirmed, with costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Hoover
218 P. 1003 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 La. Ann. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuyes-v-avegno-la-1871.