Tutunjian v. Vetzigian

274 A.D. 910, 83 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4003
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 910 (Tutunjian v. Vetzigian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tutunjian v. Vetzigian, 274 A.D. 910, 83 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

Cross appeals by plaintiffs and certain defendants in an action to compel the performance of a contract made by a husband and wife in relation to the disposal of their properties upon the death of the survivor. Judgment requiring the representative of the wife and the next of kin, and distributees of the wife under the will dated December 6, 1944, to perform her contract with her husband as manifested by the joint will of the husband and wife of April 25, 1942, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. The decree is in accord with sound authority. (Hermann v. Ludwig, 186 App. Div. 287, affd. 229 N. Y. 544; Rastetter v. Hoenninger, 214 N. Y. 66.) This being an action in equity, the granting or withholding of costs (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1477) rested in discretion. Subdivision 6 of section 1470 of the Civil, Practice Act, invoked by the plaintiffs, relates, to actions at law. (11 Carmody on New York Pleading and Practice, § 70.) Present— Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindley v. Lindley
356 P.2d 455 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D. 910, 83 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tutunjian-v-vetzigian-nyappdiv-1948.