Tutundgy v. Tutundgy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tutundgy v. Tutundgy

253 A.D. 839, 1 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D. 839 (Tutundgy v. Tutundgy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tutundgy v. Tutundgy, 253 A.D. 839, 1 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order directing issuance of commission to examine four witnesses on open commission and five witnesses on written interrogatories, granting a stay of the trial of the action, and granting the plaintiff $1,750 additional counsel fee, modified by reducing the counsel fee to $1,000 and by allowing the appellant to cross-examine orally the following witnesses: Alexander Halaby, Ibrahim S. Halaby, Antonios Moukaiber, Blanche Chalhoub, and Antoine Nasser. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. These witnesses are concededly friendly to the plaintiff and hostile to the defendant. He should be permitted to cross-examine them orally. In our opinion the reduced amount will cover the expense entailed. Carswell, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order directing issuance of commission to examine four witnesses on open commission and five witnesses on written interrogatories, granting a stay of the trial of the action, and granting the plaintiff $1,750 additional counsel fee, modified by reducing the counsel fee to $1,000 and by allowing the appellant to cross-examine orally the following witnesses: Alexander Halaby, Ibrahim S. Halaby, Antonios Moukaiber, Blanche Chalhoub, and Antoine Nasser. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. These witnesses are concededly friendly to the plaintiff and hostile to the defendant. He should be permitted to cross-examine them orally. In our opinion the reduced amount will cover the expense entailed. Carswell, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 839, 1 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tutundgy-v-tutundgy-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack