Tuttle v. State

462 So. 2d 585, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 256, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 1985·No. Nos. 84-408, 84-409·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences; however, we note two irregularities in the written judgments which must be corrected. The defendant was convicted of two counts of delivery of cocaine, which is a second-degree felony under section 893.13(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes (Supp.1982). See § 893.03(2)(a)4. Yet, the written judgment on the first count of delivery of cocaine, Circuit Court Case No. 83-5873, incorrectly adjudicated defendant guilty of a third-degree felony under section 893.13(l)(a)2. The written judgment on the other count of delivery of cocaine, Circuit Court Case No. 83-5874, incorrectly adjudicated defendant guilty under section 893.13(l)(a)2 instead of section 893.-13(l)(a)l. We remand these eases with directions that both written judgments should be corrected. See Sparkman v. State, 445 So.2d 1115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Jackson v. State, 445 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

SCHEB, A.C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and MALONEY, DENNIS P„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuttle v. State, 462 So. 2d 585, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 256, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

462 So. 2d 585 (Tuttle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
445 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Sparkman v. State
445 So. 2d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)