Tuttle v. Harris
92 A. 596, 83 N.J. Eq. 666, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 395
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swanze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Heppenheimer, Williams — 13.
For reversal — Fone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tuttle v. Harris, 92 A. 596, 83 N.J. Eq. 666, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 395 (N.J. 1914).
92 A. 596 (Tuttle v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mid-West Engineering & Construction Co. v. Campagna
397 S.W.2d 616 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1965)
Rouse v. Pollard
18 A.2d 5 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Tipula v. Garfield Mill, Inc.
170 A. 228 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)