Tuttle v. Bigelow

1 Root 108
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 15, 1788·Published

Opinion

And the judgment of the Superior Court is — That there is manifest error in the judgment complained of, for the agreement to give forbearance to June, and to accept the rum at Hartford, on the request of the defendant, is a good consideration of the promise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuttle v. Bigelow, 1 Root 108 (Colo. Ct. App. 1788).

1 Root 108 (Tuttle v. Bigelow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.