Tuttle v. Apgar
This text of 96 A. 96 (Tuttle v. Apgar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was tried before Judge Lloyd in the. Middlesex Circuit Court without a jury, who gave judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and defendants appealed.
The record brought up fails to show any request to the trial court, by the appealing party, to make a finding or findings of law or fact, or law and fact, or any exception or objection to the adverse finding made. On this record there is nothing to be reviewed. Blanchard Brothers v. Beveridge, 86 N. J. L. 561. See, also, Webster v. Freeholders of Hudson, Id. 256.
The judgment, under review must be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Syvayze, Teenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vbedkxbuegh, White, Teehune, HepPJENHEIMKR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOE, JJ. 16.
Fo reversal—Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A. 96, 88 N.J.L. 742, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuttle-v-apgar-nj-1915.