Tuttle & Lee Associates v. Deltona Realty Trust

414 A.2d 534, 1980 Me. LEXIS 569
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided May 16, 1980·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Prior to briefing and oral argument on the merits, plaintiff-appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal. The sole contention made by defendant-appellant before the Superior Court was, and therefore the only issue before this court on this further appeal is, that the evidence before the District Court as the small claims court was insufficient to support its judgment of $200 entered for plaintiff. Where, as here, an appellant has failed to provide a transcript of the evidence that- was before the District Court, or any substitute therefor, an appellate court is left without any basis to assess the claim of insufficiency of the evidence. Northern Mill & Lumber Co., Inc. v. Maynard, Me., 412 A.2d 384 (1980).

The entry must be:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuttle & Lee Associates v. Deltona Realty Trust, 414 A.2d 534, 1980 Me. LEXIS 569 (Me. 1980).

414 A.2d 534 (Tuttle & Lee Associates v. Deltona Realty Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. Peterson
464 A.2d 202 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)
Martin v. Scott Paper Co.
434 A.2d 514 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland
432 A.2d 1250 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)