Tutt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tutt v. State

178 S.E.2d 339, 122 Ga. App. 673, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 996

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 21, 1970

Docket45698

StatusPublished

This text of 178 S.E.2d 339 (Tutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tutt v. State, 178 S.E.2d 339, 122 Ga. App. 673, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 996 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for involuntary manslaughter and from the denial of his motion for new trial.

Defendant was indicted for killing in the commission of an unlawful act — specifically, driving under the influence of alcohol and driving at a speed greater than 60 mph when the lawful speed at the time and place was 50 mph. The sole issue here is whether the trial court erred in charging "that the legal speed limit at the time and place of this occurrence was fifty miles per hour.” Defendant contends that the court stated the speed limit as an established fact when the evidence on the subject was in conflict.

Code Ann. §68-1626 (b)(2) fixes a speed limit for open highways of 60 mph in the hours from one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset (50 mph all other times). The alleged manslaughter occurred in Lincolnton on July 4, 1969. The United States Naval Observatory certifies sunset at that time and place at 8:44 p.m. EDT, which would set the speed limit change-over at 9:14 p.m. The testimony concerning the time of the occurrence is vague and conflicting, ranging from 8 to 9:30 p.m. (though all witnesses seemed to agree it was dark or close to it). Testimony concerning defendant’s speed varied from 55 to 65 mph.

With the testimony on the time of the occurrence in conflict, the speed limit was not an established fact. In charging that it was 50 mph, the court expressed an opinion that it had been proved. This requires a mandatory reversal and new trial under Code §81-1104. See Blumenthal v. State, 121 Ga. 477 (49 SE 597); Mitchell v. State, 89 Ga. App. 80 (78 SE2d 563).

Judgment reversed.

Deen and Evans, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for involuntary manslaughter and from the denial of his motion for new trial.

Defendant was indicted for killing in the commission of an unlawful act — specifically, driving under the influence of alcohol and driving at a speed greater than 60 mph when the lawful speed at the time and place was 50 mph. The sole issue here is whether the trial court erred in charging "that the legal speed limit at the time and place of this occurrence was fifty miles per hour.” Defendant contends that the court stated the speed limit as an established fact when the evidence on the subject was in conflict.

Code Ann. §68-1626 (b)(2) fixes a speed limit for open highways of 60 mph in the hours from one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset (50 mph all other times). The alleged manslaughter occurred in Lincolnton on July 4, 1969. The United States Naval Observatory certifies sunset at that time and place at 8:44 p.m. EDT, which would set the speed limit change-over at 9:14 p.m. The testimony concerning the time of the occurrence is vague and conflicting, ranging from 8 to 9:30 p.m. (though all witnesses seemed to agree it was dark or close to it). Testimony concerning defendant’s speed varied from 55 to 65 mph.

With the testimony on the time of the occurrence in conflict, the speed limit was not an established fact. In charging that it was 50 mph, the court expressed an opinion that it had been proved. This requires a mandatory reversal and new trial under Code §81-1104. See Blumenthal v. State, 121 Ga. 477 (49 SE 597); Mitchell v. State, 89 Ga. App. 80 (78 SE2d 563).

Judgment reversed.

Deen and Evans, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 S.E.2d 339, 122 Ga. App. 673, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tutt-v-state-gactapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack