Tutt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tutt v. State

112 S.E. 290, 28 Ga. App. 556, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 685

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 9, 1922

Docket13390

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 290 (Tutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tutt v. State, 112 S.E. 290, 28 Ga. App. 556, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 685 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While the evidence against the accused was weak, this court cannot say that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence, and, as the finding of the jury has been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While the evidence against the accused was weak, this court cannot say that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence, and, as the finding of the jury has been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 S.E. 290, 28 Ga. App. 556, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tutt-v-state-gactapp-1922.