Tutson, Antwain Jamar

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 25, 2018
DocketWR-83,264-03
StatusPublished

This text of Tutson, Antwain Jamar (Tutson, Antwain Jamar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tutson, Antwain Jamar, (Tex. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,264-03

EX PARTE ANTWAIN JAMAR TUTSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 066888-02-E-WR IN THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to thirteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant contends that he was not notified until November 7, 2017 that the trial court

entered a judgment nunc pro tunc on March 11, 2015. Applicant wants an out-of-time appeal.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Blanton v. State, 369

S.W.3d 894, 904 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As 2

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM .

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If he is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to

represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

received timely notice of the March 11, 2015 judgment nunc pro tunc and whether he is entitled to

an out-of-time appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of

law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus

relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be

requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: July 25, 2018 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Blanton, Donald Gene
369 S.W.3d 894 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tutson, Antwain Jamar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tutson-antwain-jamar-texcrimapp-2018.