Tuten v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tuten v. State

816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 2002 WL 1071948

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 2002

DocketNo. 5D01-332

StatusPublished

This text of 816 So. 2d 1236 (Tuten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tuten v. State, 816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 2002 WL 1071948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Reyka v. Halifax Hosp. Dist., 657 So.2d 967, 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (On appeal, the trial court’s decision to give a particular instruction will [1237]*1237not be reversed “unless the error complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or where the instruction or failure to give a requested instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury”).

THOMPSON, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Reyka v. Halifax Hosp. Dist., 657 So.2d 967, 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (On appeal, the trial court’s decision to give a particular instruction will [1237]*1237not be reversed “unless the error complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or where the instruction or failure to give a requested instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury”).

THOMPSON, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 2002 WL 1071948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuten-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack