Tuten v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tuten v. State

816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 2002 WL 1071948

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2002·No. No. 5D01-332·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Reyka v. Halifax Hosp. Dist., 657 So.2d 967, 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (On appeal, the trial court’s decision to give a particular instruction will [1237]*1237not be reversed “unless the error complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or where the instruction or failure to give a requested instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury”).

THOMPSON, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Reyka v. Halifax Hosp. Dist., 657 So.2d 967, 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (On appeal, the trial court’s decision to give a particular instruction will [1237]*1237not be reversed “unless the error complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or where the instruction or failure to give a requested instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury”).

THOMPSON, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Tuten v. State, 816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 2002 WL 1071948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

816 So. 2d 1236 (Tuten v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related