Tuten v. Cincinnati Insurance

743 So. 2d 617, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13718, 1999 WL 931892
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1999·No. No. 98-3575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaForet, 586 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Bird Lakes Dev. Corp. v. Meruelo, 582 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

BOOTH, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuten v. Cincinnati Insurance, 743 So. 2d 617, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13718, 1999 WL 931892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

743 So. 2d 617 (Tuten v. Cincinnati Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo
582 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LaForet
586 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)