Tuten v. Cincinnati Insurance

743 So. 2d 617, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13718, 1999 WL 931892
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 20, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3575
StatusPublished

This text of 743 So. 2d 617 (Tuten v. Cincinnati Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuten v. Cincinnati Insurance, 743 So. 2d 617, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13718, 1999 WL 931892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaForet, 586 So.2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Bird Lakes Dev. Corp. v. Meruelo, 582 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

BOOTH, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo
582 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. LaForet
586 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
743 So. 2d 617, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13718, 1999 WL 931892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuten-v-cincinnati-insurance-fladistctapp-1999.