Tute v. Freeman

General Court of Virginia

Tute v. Freeman

2 Va. Col. Dec. 50

DecidedOctober 15, 1736

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Va. Col. Dec. 50 (Tute v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tute v. Freeman, 2 Va. Col. Dec. 50 (Va. Super. Ct. 1736).

Pincite

Opinion

In debitatus assumpsit for 25;£. for Goods sold Mony paid and Services done. The Jury found only nine Pounds three Shillings Damage

S. C. Jeff: 24.

Randolph moved that no Judgment ought to be given the Damages being under .£10. Sterling and so the Action will not lie in this Court

And the Motion overruled

Sed vide the case of Pinchback v. Rogers October Court 1739. where it is adjudged contra and the case of James Bray was cited who was non-suited the Ballance of a Bond being under. 10;£ Sterling

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In debitatus assumpsit for 25;£. for Goods sold Mony paid and Services done. The Jury found only nine Pounds three Shillings Damage

S. C. Jeff: 24.

Randolph moved that no Judgment ought to be given the Damages being under .£10. Sterling and so the Action will not lie in this Court

And the Motion overruled

Sed vide the case of Pinchback v. Rogers October Court 1739. where it is adjudged contra and the case of James Bray was cited who was non-suited the Ballance of a Bond being under. 10;£ Sterling

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Va. Col. Dec. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tute-v-freeman-vagensess-1736.