Tuska v. Kranz
230 A.D. 715
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 230 A.D. 715 (Tuska v. Kranz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tuska v. Kranz, 230 A.D. 715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Nassau county, as resettled, denying motion of defendant Ford-ham Credit Corporation to open its default and vacate judgment entered against it affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuska-v-kranz-nyappdiv-1930.