Turtle Bay Ass'n v. Dinkins

207 A.D.2d 670, 616 N.Y.S.2d 31
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 1, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered November 10, 1993, which dismissed petitioners’ CPLR article 78 petition challenging respondents’ selection of 215-225 East 45th Street as a 150 bed residential treatment facility for homeless women with specialized needs, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondents’ efforts, including inspection of 18 sites, at least 9 of which were outside the area of Community Board #6, requesting the help of the Community Board members and the Borough President in their search, and reviewing whether the proposed site would have an average impact in the community, constitute substantial compliance with the fair share criteria (see, Matter of Silver v Dinkins, 158 Misc 2d 550, 553, affd for reasons stated 196 AD2d 757, lv denied 82 NY2d 659). Thus, respondents’ determination was neither arbitrary nor capricious. (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 231.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turtle Bay Ass'n v. Dinkins, 207 A.D.2d 670, 616 N.Y.S.2d 31 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 670 (Turtle Bay Ass'n v. Dinkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Kai Ming Chen v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 01861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Dodgertown Homeowners Association, Inc. v. City of New York
235 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)