Tursi v. Perla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tursi v. Perla

241 A.D.2d 518, 663 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 21, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 518 (Tursi v. Perla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tursi v. Perla, 241 A.D.2d 518, 663 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated October 12, 1994, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

According due deference to the trial court on matters of credibility, we conclude that the trial court’s findings, including the determination that there was no contract between the parties, are not against the weight of the evidence or contrary to law. Therefore, they will not be disturbed (see, Brooklyn & Queens El. Co. v Excel Assocs., 115 AD2d 630).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are either raised for the first time on appeal, and thus, not considered, or without merit. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated October 12, 1994, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

According due deference to the trial court on matters of credibility, we conclude that the trial court’s findings, including the determination that there was no contract between the parties, are not against the weight of the evidence or contrary to law. Therefore, they will not be disturbed (see, Brooklyn & Queens El. Co. v Excel Assocs., 115 AD2d 630).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are either raised for the first time on appeal, and thus, not considered, or without merit. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D.2d 518, 663 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tursi-v-perla-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack