Tursi v. Perla

241 A.D.2d 518, 663 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7782
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 21, 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated October 12, 1994, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

According due deference to the trial court on matters of credibility, we conclude that the trial court’s findings, including the determination that there was no contract between the parties, are not against the weight of the evidence or contrary to law. Therefore, they will not be disturbed (see, Brooklyn & Queens El. Co. v Excel Assocs., 115 AD2d 630).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are either raised for the first time on appeal, and thus, not considered, or without merit. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tursi v. Perla, 241 A.D.2d 518, 663 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

241 A.D.2d 518 (Tursi v. Perla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Xand Corp. v. Reliable System Alternatives Corp.
63 A.D.3d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Pav-Co Asphalt, Inc. v. Heartland Rental Properties Partnership
278 A.D.2d 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Bruk v. Albín
270 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Peters v. Nicotera
248 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)