Turrill v. Sadowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Turrill v. Sadowski

71 A.D.2d 845, 420 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 845 (Turrill v. Sadowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turrill v. Sadowski, 71 A.D.2d 845, 420 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 22, 1979, denying petition to invalidate designating petition of Mario E. Brod, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs; said petition to invalidate is granted and the Board of Elections is directed not to place the name of respondent Mario E. Brod on the ballot for the Republican Party position of District Leader for the 64th Assembly District, South Part, in the forthcoming primary election. The withdrawal by the candidate before the referee of his opposition to the invalidating petition amounted to a judicial admission which relieved the invalidating petition of the necessity of presenting proof. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lane, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 22, 1979, denying petition to invalidate designating petition of Mario E. Brod, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs; said petition to invalidate is granted and the Board of Elections is directed not to place the name of respondent Mario E. Brod on the ballot for the Republican Party position of District Leader for the 64th Assembly District, South Part, in the forthcoming primary election. The withdrawal by the candidate before the referee of his opposition to the invalidating petition amounted to a judicial admission which relieved the invalidating petition of the necessity of presenting proof. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lane, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 845, 420 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turrill-v-sadowski-nyappdiv-1979.