Turpin v. Banton

3 Ky. 312
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 6, 1808·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Opinion of the Court, which went into a detail of the cause, was bottomed upon, and recognised the following principles.

As a bill to perpetuate testimony, the purpose was effected by taking the depositions : and being accompanied with a prayer for relief, and brought on for hearing, the court did right to dismiss it, with costs. See Hall vs. Hoddisdon, 2 Pr. Wms. 162 — 1 Harr. Chan. Prac. 138.

An award determining “certain matters and accounts, now in dispute, and undetermined between the parties,” without shewing what matters and accounts were in dispute, is void, for uncertainty.

A bill in chancery will not lie, to compel the specific performance of an award, for the payment of a sum of money. The party’s remedy is at law.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turpin v. Banton, 3 Ky. 312 (Ky. Ct. App. 1808).

3 Ky. 312 (Turpin v. Banton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marinette Sawmill Co. v. Scofield
174 F. 562 (Seventh Circuit, 1909)