Turney v. Organ

16 Ill. 43
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Treat, C. J.

Organ brought an action of assumpsit against Leander Jay S. Turney, and declared upon a promissory note. The sheriff made this return upon the summons: “ Served the within by reading to Jay S. Turney.” At the return term, a judgment by default was entered for the amount of the note. The defendant then appeared and moved in arrest of judgment ; and the plaintiff entered a cross motion, that the sheriff have leave to amend his return. The court sustained the latter motion; and the sheriff so amended his return as to show service of the #writ on the defendant. The motion in arrest of judgment was then overruled.

No error was committed in allowing the sheriff to amend Ms return. The leave to amend was a matter of course. The defect in the original return was supplied by the amendment; and the court properly refused to arrest the judgment. The record now shows that the defendant was regularly before the court.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turney v. Organ, 16 Ill. 43 (Ill. 1854).

16 Ill. 43 (Turney v. Organ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rickards v. Ladd
20 F. Cas. 752 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1879)
O'Conner v. Wilson
57 Ill. 226 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)