Turney v. Organ

16 Ill. 43
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 Ill. 43 (Turney v. Organ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turney v. Organ, 16 Ill. 43 (Ill. 1854).

Opinion

Treat, C. J.

Organ brought an action of assumpsit against Leander Jay S. Turney, and declared upon a promissory note. The sheriff made this return upon the summons: “ Served the within by reading to Jay S. Turney.” At the return term, a judgment by default was entered for the amount of the note. The defendant then appeared and moved in arrest of judgment ; and the plaintiff entered a cross motion, that the sheriff have leave to amend his return. The court sustained the latter motion; and the sheriff so amended his return as to show service of the #writ on the defendant. The motion in arrest of judgment was then overruled.

No error was committed in allowing the sheriff to amend Ms return. The leave to amend was a matter of course. The defect in the original return was supplied by the amendment; and the court properly refused to arrest the judgment. The record now shows that the defendant was regularly before the court.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rickards v. Ladd
20 F. Cas. 752 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1879)
O'Conner v. Wilson
57 Ill. 226 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ill. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turney-v-organ-ill-1854.