Turney v. Gates

12 Ill. 141
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Treat, C. J.

Gates recovered a judgment against Turney, in March, 1842. No execution was issued thereon within a year. Turney died in 1844; and, in 1846, Gates sued out a scire facias to revive the judgment against his administratrix. An order was entered in that proceeding, that the judgment stand revived against the administratrix, and that the plaintiff have execution against the goods and chattels, lands and tenements of the intestate. The order was erroneous. The plaintiff was not entitled to execution on the judgment. He lost his lien on the lands of the intestate, by failing to sue out an execution within the year. The proper order would have been, that the judgment be revived against the administratrix, to be paid by her in the due course of administration. Welch v. Wallace, 3 Gilman, 490. In the distribution of the assets of deceased persons, under our statute, judgment creditors without a lien and simple contract creditors are put on the same footing. Paschall v. Hailman, 4 Gil., 285.

The judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turney v. Gates, 12 Ill. 141 (Ill. 1850).

12 Ill. 141 (Turney v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ingham v. Mitchell
176 Ill. App. 469 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
Winslow v. Leland
21 N.E. 588 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1889)
Simpson v. McPhail
17 Ill. App. 499 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Clingman v. Hopkie
78 Ill. 152 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)