Turney v. Cook

Ohio Supreme Court

Turney v. Cook

169 N.E. 297, 120 Ohio St. 616, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 616, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 366

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 3, 1929

Docket21376

StatusPublished

This text of 169 N.E. 297 (Turney v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turney v. Cook, 169 N.E. 297, 120 Ohio St. 616, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 616, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 366 (Ohio 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating), and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating), and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 N.E. 297, 120 Ohio St. 616, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 616, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turney-v-cook-ohio-1929.