Turner v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Turner v. Williams

237 A.D.2d 281, 655 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2100

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 A.D.2d 443 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1997·Published

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a permanent injunction, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated January 18, 1996, which denied their motion for a preliminary injunction and vacated a temporary restraining order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants have failed to demonstrate the requisite likelihood of success on the merits warranting the injunctive relief sought (see, Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d 860; Jurlique, Inc. v Austral Biolab Pty., 187 AD2d 637). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for a permanent injunction, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated January 18, 1996, which denied their motion for a preliminary injunction and vacated a temporary restraining order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants have failed to demonstrate the requisite likelihood of success on the merits warranting the injunctive relief sought (see, Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d 860; Jurlique, Inc. v Austral Biolab Pty., 187 AD2d 637). Rosenblatt, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Turner v. Williams, 237 A.D.2d 281, 655 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

237 A.D.2d 281 (Turner v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related