Turner v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Turner v. Wainwright

161 So. 2d 12

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1964·No. No. 4835·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed a petition for habeas corpus in this court, alleging, inter alia, exhaustion of remedies under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. Examination of the opinion in Turner v. State, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 11, reveals that the trial court’s order denying petitioner-appellant’s motion under Rule No. 1 was affirmed without prejudice to further proceedings by proper motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1.

In view of the ostensive adequacy of remedy under Rule No. 1, the petition for habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to petitioner’s rights under Rule No. 1.

It is so ordered.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed a petition for habeas corpus in this court, alleging, inter alia, exhaustion of remedies under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. Examination of the opinion in Turner v. State, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 11, reveals that the trial court’s order denying petitioner-appellant’s motion under Rule No. 1 was affirmed without prejudice to further proceedings by proper motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1.

In view of the ostensive adequacy of remedy under Rule No. 1, the petition for habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to petitioner’s rights under Rule No. 1.

It is so ordered.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Turner v. Wainwright, 161 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

161 So. 2d 12 (Turner v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related