Turner v. United States Marshals Office

Fourth Circuit

Turner v. United States Marshals Office

586 F. App'x 122

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 2, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1720

StatusPublished

This text of 586 F. App'x 122 (Turner v. United States Marshals Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. United States Marshals Office, 586 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodel R. Turner, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging that the Defendant violated his civil rights by failing to effect service of process on a defendant in a separate action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. United States Marshals Office, No. 1:14-cv-01486-ELH (D.Md. May 9, 2014). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodel R. Turner, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging that the Defendant violated his civil rights by failing to effect service of process on a defendant in a separate action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. United States Marshals Office, No. 1:14-cv-01486-ELH (D.Md. May 9, 2014). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 F. App'x 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-united-states-marshals-office-ca4-2014.