Turner v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 463
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 317
United States Customs Court·Decided May 4, 1961·No. No. 65581; protests 149759-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Pord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “B” consist of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored, with gold lacquer, the claim at 35 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for articles, not specially provided for, plated with silver on metals other than nickel silver or copper, but not in chief value of silver, was sustained. The items marked “C,” stipulated to be the same as those involved in said Abstract 62036, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in said paragraph 397, as modified, supra, for articles, not specially provided for, plated with silver on nickel silver or copper, but not in chief value of silver, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 463 (cusc 1961).

46 Cust. Ct. 463 (Turner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.