Turner v. United States
31 Cust. Ct. 275, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Cust. Ct. 278 →
United States Customs Court·Decided October 29, 1953·No. No. 57576; protest 183786-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
[276]*276Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of a Niro spray drying unit the same in all material respects as that the subject of Davies Turner & Co. and Niro Corp. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 248, C. D. 1477), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Turner v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 275, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1103 (cusc 1953).
31 Cust. Ct. 275 (Turner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turner v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 248 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)